$CN^-$ and $N_2$ are isoelectronic,but $N_2$ is chemically inert compared to $CN^-$. The reason is:

  • A
    Higher bond energy.
  • B
    Bond polarity.
  • C
    Unequal electron distribution.
  • D
    Presence of more electrons in bonding orbitals.

Explore More

Similar Questions

Which of the following statements is incorrect?

Which of the following is paramagnetic?

For $F_2$ and $OF$ molecules,consider the following statements:
$(a)$ Bond order for both is one
$(b)$ $OF$ is paramagnetic but $F_2$ is diamagnetic
$(c)$ $F_2$ is more likely to dissociate into atoms than $OF$
$(d)$ Both have greater number of electrons in $BMO$ than that in $ABMO$
Which of the following statements are true $(T)$ or false $(F)$ respectively?

Difficult
View Solution

Assuming that Hund's rule is violated,the bond order and magnetic nature of the diatomic molecule $B_2$ is

$A$ pair of isoelectronic species having bond order of $1$ is

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo