$A$ beam of fast-moving alpha particles was directed towards a thin gold foil. The parts $A'$,$B'$,and $C'$ of the transmitted and reflected beams corresponding to the incident parts $A$,$B$,and $C$ of the beam are shown in the adjoining diagram. The number of alpha particles in:

According to the nuclear model of an atom,where is the whole mass of the atom located?

An alpha particle is accelerated through a potential difference of $10^6 \ V$. Its kinetic energy will be $MeV$.

In the Rutherford scattering experiment,what will be the correct scattering angle $\theta$ for an $\alpha$-particle with an impact parameter $b = 0$ (in $^o$)?

$A$ proton is fired from very far away towards a nucleus with charge $Q=120 \ e$,where $e$ is the electronic charge. It makes a closest approach of $10 \ fm$ to the nucleus. The de Broglie wavelength (in units of $fm$) of the proton at its start is: (take the proton mass,$m_0 = (5/3) \times 10^{-27} \ kg$,$h/e = 4.2 \times 10^{-15} \ J \cdot s/C$,$\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} = 9 \times 10^9 \ N \cdot m^2/C^2$,$1 \ fm = 10^{-15} \ m$)

Answer the following questions,which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e.,scattering of $\alpha$-particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$) predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed,it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t$,the number of $\alpha$-particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$-particles by a thin foil?