Explain Gauss's law for magnetism.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) Consider a closed surface $S$ placed in a magnetic field $\vec{B}$. We need to determine the magnetic flux associated with this surface.
Imagine the surface $S$ is divided into small area elements. For one such element $\Delta \vec{S}$, the magnetic field is $\vec{B}$. The magnetic flux $\Delta \phi_{B}$ through this element is defined as:
$\Delta \phi_{B} = \vec{B} \cdot \Delta \vec{S}$
The total magnetic flux $\phi_{B}$ through the closed surface is the sum of the fluxes through all such elements:
$\phi_{B} = \sum_{\text{all}} \Delta \phi_{B} = \sum_{\text{all}} \vec{B} \cdot \Delta \vec{S} = 0 \quad \dots (1)$
Since the number of magnetic field lines leaving the closed surface is equal to the number of lines entering it, the net magnetic flux through any closed surface is always zero.
Gauss's law for magnetism states:
"The net magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero."
In the limit where $\Delta S \rightarrow 0$, the summation becomes an integral:
$\phi_{B} = \oint_{S} \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{S} = 0$
This integral form is the mathematical representation of Gauss's law for magnetism.

Explore More

Similar Questions

$(a)$ Magnetic field lines show the direction (at every point) along which a small magnetised needle aligns (at the point). Do the magnetic field lines also represent the lines of force on a moving charged particle at every point?
$(b)$ Magnetic field lines can be entirely confined within the core of a toroid,but not within a straight solenoid. Why?
$(c)$ If magnetic monopoles existed,how would the Gauss's law of magnetism be modified?
$(d)$ Does a bar magnet exert a torque on itself due to its own field? Does one element of a current-carrying wire exert a force on another element of the same wire?
$(e)$ Magnetic field arises due to charges in motion. Can a system have magnetic moments even though its net charge is zero?

Given below are two statements $:$ one is labelled as Assertion $(A)$ and the other is labelled as Reason $(R)$.
Assertion $(A) :$ Magnetic monopoles do not exist.
Reason $(R) :$ Magnetic field lines are continuous and form closed loops.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below.

$A$ square of side $x \, m$ lies in the $x-y$ plane in a region where the magnetic field is given by $\vec B = B_0 (3\hat i + 4\hat j + 5\hat k ) \, T$,where $B_0$ is a constant. The magnitude of the magnetic flux passing through the square is:

Assertion $(A)$: When the plane of the coil is perpendicular to the magnetic field,the magnetic flux linked with the coil is minimum,but the induced emf is zero.
Reason $(R)$: $\phi = nAB \cos \theta$ and $e = -\frac{d\phi}{dt}$.

$A$ square loop of side $1\,m$ and resistance $1\,\Omega$ is placed in a magnetic field of $0.5\,T$. If the plane of the loop is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field,the magnetic flux through the loop is $\dots\dots$ weber.

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo