Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion $A$ and the other is labelled as Reason $R$:
Assertion $(A)$: Recent studies do not entirely support the Gause's 'Competitive Exclusion Principle' in nature.
Reason $(R)$: Recent studies of competition rule out the occurrence of interspecific competition in nature.
In the light of the above statements,choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

  • A
    Assertion and Reason both are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
  • B
    Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
  • C
    Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
  • D
    Assertion and Reason both are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Explore More

Similar Questions

Level of competition between species depends on
$I.$ availability of resources
$II.$ population density
$III.$ group interaction of organisms
Choose the correct combination

Statement $-I:$ The interaction where one species is benefitted and the other is neither benefitted nor harmed is called commensalism.
Statement $-II:$ Barnacles growing on the back of a whale is an example of commensalism.

Choose the incorrect pair.

In which kind of population interaction, one species is harmed whereas the other is unaffected?

Which one of the following is not a matching pair of certain organism$(s)$ and the kind of association?

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo