Which of the following statements is correct?

Name: Exam Paper Generator | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

Question

(C) $1$. Linkage isomerism is shown by ligands that have two donor atoms (ambidentate ligands). In $[Pt(NO_3)_2(en)_2]^{2+}$,the $NO_3^-$ ligand is no

Vedclass · Accepted Answer

$FeCl_3 \cdot 6H_2O$ can show hydrate isomerism

Vedclass · Answer

(C) $1$. Linkage isomerism is shown by ligands that have two donor atoms (ambidentate ligands). In $[Pt(NO_3)_2(en)_2]^{2+}$,the $NO_3^-$ ligand is not ambidentate,so it does not show linkage isomerism.$2$. Ionization isomerism occurs when the counter ion in the coordination sphere is a potential ligand and can displace a ligand in the coordination sphere. In $[Cr(CO_3)(NH_3)_4]Br$,the $Br^-$ ion can exchange with the $CO_3^{2-}$ ion,thus exhibiting ionization isomerism.$3$. Hydrate isomerism occurs when water molecules act as ligands or as free molecules of hydration. $FeCl_3 \cdot 6H_2O$ can exist as $[Fe(H_2O)_6]Cl_3$,$[Fe(H_2O)_5Cl]Cl_2 \cdot H_2O$,etc.,thus it shows hydrate isomerism.$4$. $[FeCl_3(NH_3)_3]$ exhibits geometrical isomerism (facial and meridional),which is a type of stereoisomerism,not structural isomerism.$5$. Both $B$ and $C$ are technically correct statements in the context of coordination chemistry. However,$FeCl_3 \cdot 6H_2O$ is the classic textbook example for hydrate isomerism.

Similar Questions

Which one is an incorrect statement?

Which of the following statements is correct for any thermodynamic system?

The most likely reason for the development of resistance against pesticides in insects damaging a crop is

It is now possible to breed plants and animals with desired characters through

Two electric bulbs whose resistances are in the ratio of $1:2$ are connected in parallel to a constant voltage source. The ratio of the power dissipated in them is:

Vedclass Test Series

Exam Paper Generator

Online Exam Module