Show that the relation $R$ in the set of real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ defined as $R = \{(a, b) : a \leq b\}$ is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) Given the relation $R = \{(a, b) : a \leq b\}$ on the set of real numbers $\mathbb{R}$.
$1$. Reflexive: For any $a \in \mathbb{R}$,we know that $a \leq a$ is always true. Therefore,$(a, a) \in R$ for all $a \in \mathbb{R}$. Hence,$R$ is reflexive.
$2$. Symmetric: Consider $(2, 4) \in R$ because $2 \leq 4$. However,$(4, 2) \notin R$ because $4 \not\leq 2$. Since $(a, b) \in R$ does not imply $(b, a) \in R$,the relation is not symmetric.
$3$. Transitive: Let $(a, b) \in R$ and $(b, c) \in R$. This means $a \leq b$ and $b \leq c$. By the transitive property of inequality,$a \leq c$. Therefore,$(a, c) \in R$. Hence,$R$ is transitive.
Conclusion: The relation $R$ is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.

Explore More

Similar Questions

In the set $A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$,a relation $R$ is defined by $R = \{(x, y) | x, y \in A \text{ and } x < y\}$. Then $R$ is

Let $S$ be the set of all real numbers. Then the relation $R = \{(a, b) : 1 + ab > 0\}$ on $S$ is

Difficult
View Solution

If $R$ is an equivalence relation on a set $A$,then $R^{-1}$ is not :-

If $R$ is an equivalence relation on a set $A$,then $R^{-1}$ is

Let $A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$ and $R$ be a relation in $A$ defined by $R = \{(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4), (1, 2), (2, 1), (3, 1), (1, 3)\}$. Then $R$ is

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo