Let $p$ be the statement '$x$ is an irrational number',$q$ be the statement '$y$ is a transcendental number',and $r$ be the statement '$x$ is a rational number or $y$ is a transcendental number'.
Statement-$1$: $r$ is equivalent to $q \lor p$.
Statement-$2$: $r$ is equivalent to $(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q)$.

  • A
    Statement-$1$ is false. Statement-$2$ is true.
  • B
    Statement-$1$ is true. Statement-$2$ is false.
  • C
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true. Statement-$2$ is the correct explanation for Statement-$1$.
  • D
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true. Statement-$2$ is not the correct explanation for Statement-$1$.

Explore More

Similar Questions

The negation of $q \vee \sim (p \wedge r)$ is

The negation of the compound statement $\sim p \vee (p \vee (\sim q))$ is

The statement $[p \wedge (q \vee r)] \vee [\sim r \wedge \sim q \wedge p]$ is equivalent to

Let $\Delta, \nabla \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$ be such that $(p \nabla q) \Rightarrow ((p \nabla q) \nabla r)$ is a tautology. Then $(p \nabla q) \Delta r$ is logically equivalent to

Write the negation of the following statement:
The number $2$ is greater than $7.$

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo