Let $R$ be a relation from $N$ to $N$ defined by $R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in N \text{ and } a = b^2\}$. Is the following statement true?
$(a, b) \in R, (b, c) \in R$ implies $(a, c) \in R$

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) The relation is defined as $R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in N \text{ and } a = b^2\}$.
To check if $(a, b) \in R$ and $(b, c) \in R$ implies $(a, c) \in R$,we test with counterexamples.
Consider $a = 16, b = 4, c = 2$.
Since $16 = 4^2$,we have $(16, 4) \in R$.
Since $4 = 2^2$,we have $(4, 2) \in R$.
Now,we check if $(16, 2) \in R$.
For $(16, 2)$ to be in $R$,it must satisfy $a = b^2$,which means $16 = 2^2$.
Since $16 \neq 4$,$(16, 2) \notin R$.
Therefore,the statement is false.

Explore More

Similar Questions

Let $P$ be the relation defined on the set of all real numbers such that $P = \{(a,b) : \sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1\}$. Then $P$ is

Let $R$ be a relation from $Q$ to $Q$ defined by $R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in Q \text{ and } a - b \in Z \}$. Show that $(a, b) \in R$ and $(b, c) \in R$ implies that $(a, c) \in R$.

Let $R$ and $S$ be two equivalence relations on a set $A$. Then

Let $A = \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$. Let $R$ be a relation on $A$ defined by $(x, y) \in R$ if and only if $\max\{x, y\} \in \{3, 4\}$. Then among the statements $(S_1)$: The number of elements in $R$ is $18$,and $(S_2)$: The relation $R$ is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive:

$A$ relation $R$ on a non-empty set $A$ is an equivalence relation if $R$ is:

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo